Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 1 | Issue 3 | Year 2011 | Article Id. IJCOT-V1I3P309 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22492593/IJCOT-V1I3P309
Resource Choice in Large Level Scattered Systems By Means Of Accessibility of Information
Bachina Anusha , T.V.Sai Krishna
Citation :
Bachina Anusha , T.V.Sai Krishna, "Resource Choice in Large Level Scattered Systems By Means Of Accessibility of Information," International Journal of Computer & Organization Trends (IJCOT), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 45-49, 2011. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22492593/ IJCOT-V1I3P309
Abstract
Scientific applications are data intensive and require access to a significant amount of dispersed data. Hence, in order to accommodate data - intensive applications in loosely coupled distributed systems, it is essential to consider not only the computational capability, but also the data accessibility of computational nodes to the required data objects. We introduce the notion of accessibility to capture both availability and performance. An increasing number of data - intensive applications require not only considerations of node computation power but also accessibility for adequate job allocations. For instance, selecting a node with intolerably slow connections can offset any benefit to running on a fast node. In this project, we present accessibility - aware resource selection tec hniques by which it is possible to choose nodes that will have efficient data access to remote data sources. We show that the local data access observations collected from a node’s neighbors are sufficient to characterize accessibility for that node. The s uggested techniques are also shown to be stable even under churn despite the loss of prior observations.
Keywords
Data Accessibility, resource choice, large - level scattered systems
References
[1] D.P. Anderson and G. Fedak, “The Computational and
Storage
[2] A. Haeberlen, A. Mislove, and P. Druschel, “Glacier: Highly
Durable, Decentralized Storage Despite Massive Correlated
Failures,”Proc. Symp. Networked Systems Design and
Implementation(NSDI ’05), May 2005.
[3] J. Kubiatowicz, D. Bindel, Y. Chen, P. Eaton, D. Geels, R.
Gummadi,S. Rhea, H. Weatherspoon, W. Weimer, C. Wells,
and B. Zhao,“Oceanstore: An Architecture for Global-Scale
Persistent Storage,”Proc. ACM Int’l Conf. Architectural
Support for ProgrammingLanguages and Operating Systems
(ASPLOS ’07), Nov. 2000.KIM ET AL.: USING DATA
ACCESSIBILITY FOR RESOURCE SELECTION IN
LARGE-SCALE DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS 799
[5] A. Chien, B. Calder, S. Elbert, and K. Bhatia, “Entropia:
Architecture and Performance of an Enterprise Desktop Grid
System,” J. Parallel and Distributed Computing, 49] D.P.
Anderson, J. Cobb, E. Korpela, M. Lebofsky, and D.
Werthimer, “Seti@home: An Experiment in Public-Resource
Computing,” Comm. ACM, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 56-61, 2002.
[6] “Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Project,”
[7] “BOINC: Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network
Computing,”
[8] N. Massey, T. Aina, M. Allen, C. Christensen, D. Frame, D.
Goodman, J. Kettleborough, A. Martin, S. Pascoe, and D.
Stainforth,“Data Access and Analysis with Distributed
Federated DataServers in climateprediction.net,” Advances in
Geosciences, vol. 8,pp. 49-56, June 2006.
[9] G.B. Berriman, A.C. Laity, J.C. Good, J.C. Jacob, D.S. Katz,
E.Deelman, G. Singh, M.-H. Su, and T.A. Prince, “Montage:
The Architecture and Scientific Applications of a National
Virtual Observatory Service for Computing Astronomical
Image Mosaics,”
[10] “BLAST: The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool,” http://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast, 2009.
[11] W. Hoschek, F.J. Jae´n-Martı´nez, A. Samar, H. Stockinger,
and K. Stockinger, “Data Management in an International
Data Grid Project,” Proc. IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. Grid
Computing (GRID ’00), pp. 77-90, 2000.
[12] Y.-M. Teo, X. Wang, and Y.-K. Ng, “Glad: A System for
Developing and Deploying Large-Scale Bioinformatics
Grid,” Bioinformatics, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 794-802, 2005.
[13] S. Hotz, “Routing Information Organization to Support
Scalable Interdomain Routing with Heterogeneous Path
Requirements,”PhD dissertation, 1994.
[14] J.D. Guyton and M.F. Schwartz, “Locating Nearby Copies of
Replicated Internet Servers,” SIGCOMM Computer Comm. Rev.,
vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 288-298, 1995.
[15] E. Ng and H. Zhang, “Predicting Internet Network Distance
with Coordiantes-Based Approaches,” Proc. IEEE
INFOCOM
[16] E. Cohen and S. Shenker, “Replication Strategies in
Unstructured Peer-to-Peer Networks,” Proc. ACM
SIGCOMM
[17] Q. Lv, P. Cao, E. Cohen, K. Li, and S. Shenker, “Search and
Replication in Unstructured Peer-to-Peer Networks,” Proc.
ACM SIGMETRICS ’02, pp. 258-259, 2002.
[18] S. Ratnasamy, P. Francis, M. Handley, R. Karp, and S.
Schenker,“A Scalable Content-Addressable Network,” Proc.
ACM SIGCOMM
[19] A. Rowstron and P. Druschel, “Pastry: Scalable, Distributed
Object Location and Routing for Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer
Systems,”
[20] “PlanetLab Iperf,” http://jabber.services.planetlab.org/php/